증산도 뉴욕법정 사기 합의서 공개!!!
페이지 정보
작성자 정적 작성일18-10-01 22:50 조회2,598회 댓글3건본문
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
This Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Jeungsando of America, Inc. (“Jeungsando of America”), a religious corporation, Myung Sun Yoo (“Yoo”), Jae Nam Kim (“Kim”) and Jae Sung Chung (“Chung”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Karys Dalsook Ma (“Ma”), and Un Sook Park (“Park”) (collectively “Defendants”), on the other hand. Plaintiffs and Defendants are sometimes referred to collectively as the “Parties” and referred to individually as a “Party.”
WHEREAS, on or about November 9, 2015, Jeungsando of America and Yoo filed a lawsuit against Ma and Park in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. CV 15-6400-CBA-VMS, alleging claims for defamation, copyright infringement, under the Digital Millennial Copyright Act, prima facie tort, civil conspiracy, under the Enforcement Act (Civil Rights Act) of 1871; full faith and credit, res judicata, and collateral estoppel for decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea and the Seoul Central District Court of the Republic of Korea, under the New York State Constitution Bill of Rights and injunctive relief (the “New York Action”);
WHEREAS, on or about June 30, 2016, Ma filed a lawsuit against Joong Kun Ahn, Jeungsando (a Korean religious organization (“Jeungsando”)), Kim, Chung and Jong Sung Lee, Hyung Sung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Seok Kim, Kiyong Kim, Myung Sun Yoo, and Does 1-50, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC625692, alleging claims for slander and libel, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, declarative relief, and false accusation (the “California Action”);
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2017, the Court in the California Action sustained Ho Jin Chung’s demurrer without leave to amend, and dismissed the entire action as against Ho Jin Chung;
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2017, the Court in the California Action granted Kim and Chung’s Special Motion to Strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, and denied Kim and Chung’s request for attorneys’ fees without prejudice;
WHEREAS, persons affiliated with Jeungsando have caused civil and criminal actions to be brought against Ma in the Republic of Korea for copyright violations and defamation (the “Korea Actions”);
WHEREAS, the Parties hereto wish to forever discharge and release all claims, demands, liabilities, and causes of action between them, including the New York Action, California Action, and Korea Action (collectively the “Actions”);
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
- Effective Date. This Settlement Agreement is effective as of the date a fully executed Settlement Agreement signed by all of the Parties is exchanged among the Parties by and through their respective counsel (“Effective Date”).
- Dismissal of the Actions. Within fifteen (15) business days of the Effective Date:
a. the Parties will cause the New York Action and the California Action to be dismissed with prejudice; and
b. Jeungsando of America and its affiliates will cause Ma and Park to be dismissed with prejudice from the Korean Actions, to the extent such dismissal is under its control.
- Non-Disparagement.
a. Plaintiffs shall not disparage Defendants, including, without limitation, by making, assisting, participating in, or publishing statements (including, without limitation, oral or written statements, internet or social media postings) that defame, impugn, or are otherwise derogatory about any of them, now or in the future.
b. Defendants shall not disparage Plaintiffs or their known affiliates, officers and directors, including Jeungsando (a Korean religious organization), Joong Kun Ahn, Jong Sung Lee, Hyung Sung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Seok Kim, Kiyong Kim, and Myung Sun Yoo, including, without limitation, by making, assisting, participating in, or publishing statements (including, without limitation, oral or written statements, internet or social media postings) that defame, impugn, or are otherwise derogatory about any of them, now or in the future. Defendants specifically agree to immediately cease hosting, assisting, creating, operating and/or publishing, and refrain from hosting, assisting, creating, operating and/or publishing in the future, any internet website, blog, or other social media posting that contains statements that disparage Plaintiffs (regardless of whether such statements are authored by Defendants or re-published by Defendants).
c. To effectuate the non-disparagement agreement and to prevent confusion among the public as to who operates the website http://www.jeungsandoamerica.com, Ma agrees to take down the website http://www.jeungsandoamerica.com and to forego the use of the URL http://www.jeungsandoamerica.com now and in the future.
- Specific Performance. The Parties acknowledge and agree that any one of them would be damaged irreparably in the event any of the provisions of Section 3 of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or otherwise are breached. Accordingly, in the event of a breach of Section 3 by any one Defendant, the Plaintiff who was disparaged shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions against the breaching Defendant to prevent further breaches of Section 3 of this Agreement and to enforce specifically Section 3 of this Agreement in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. In the event of a breach of Section 3 by any one Plaintiff, the Defendant who was disparaged shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions against the breaching Plaintiff to prevent further breaches of Section 3 of this Agreement and to enforce specifically Section 3 of this Agreement in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles.
- Liquidated Damages for Breach. In addition to the equitable remedies specified in this Section, the Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that in the event any one of them fails to comply with any of the terms or provisions of Section 3 of this Agreement, the damages would be extremely uncertain and would be impractical and difficult to accurately ascertain. Accordingly, the Parties agree that in the event of a breach of any provision of Section 3 by any one Defendant, the Plaintiff who was disparaged shall be entitled to liquidated damages from the breaching Defendant in the amount of $36,000, and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. In the event of a breach of any provision of Section 3 by any one Plaintiff, the Defendant who was disparaged shall be entitled to liquidated damages from the breaching Plaintiff in the amount of $36,000, and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. The Parties hereby warrant that they have been represented by counsel in negotiating and effecting this provision, and the parties agree that the amounts specified herein are in all respects fair, reasonable, and proportional.
- Contingent Stipulated Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment.
a. As a part of this Agreement, the Parties shall execute a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Permanent Injunction and Judgment, in the precise form attached as Exhibit 1 (the “Stipulated Injunction and Judgment”).
b. If Jeungsando of America receives or obtains information, reflected in admissible evidence, indicating that Ma is in violation of any of the terms of Section 3 of this Settlement Agreement, Jeungsando of America shall give notice of the alleged breach to the Defendant pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 below. Ma shall have ten (10) days from receipt of the notice to explain or otherwise cure any alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement. If after the ten (10) day cure period, Ma has not cured or otherwise explained the alleged breach to Jeungsando of America’s satisfaction, Jeungsando of America shall be entitled to immediately file and seek entry of the Stipulated Injunction and Judgment, in whole or part, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California by filing the Stipulated Injunction and Judgment. Defendants reserve the right to contest any alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement, but shall not oppose the form of or relief sought by the Stipulated Injunction and Judgment if a breach of the Settlement Agreement is approved.
c. The Stipulated Injunction and Judgment shall provide for a $36,000 monetary judgment against Ma for violation of the terms of Section 3 of this Settlement Agreement, and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. The reasonableness of the monetary judgment specified herein has been determined by taking into account the circumstances existing at the time of the Effective Date, including the order granting the Special Motion to Strike in the California Litigation. The Parties agree that they have been represented by counsel in negotiating and effecting this Settlement Agreement, and the parties agree that the amounts specified herein are in all respects fair, reasonable, and proportional.
d. For purposes of filing or seeking entry of the Stipulated Injunction and Judgment, or for any subsequent litigation related to this Settlement Agreement, the Parties hereby irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County. The Parties agree that notwithstanding any confidentiality provision of this Settlement Agreement, they may disclose the terms of this Settlement Agreement to the Court for any subsequent litigation. The prevailing party in any subsequent litigation related to this Settlement Agreement shall be entitled to recover all attorney’s fees and costs incurred in such subsequent litigation, and may immediately seek any other legal and equitable remedies available to them for any violation of this Settlement Agreement.
- Plaintiffs’ Release of Defendants. Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs release and forever discharge Defendants and their past and present directors, managers, officers, shareholders, their affiliates, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and their attorneys (including but not limited to: (1) Dahiya Law Office, LLC, Karamvir Dahiya, Esq.; and (2) LK Professional Law Group, and Jamie Jiyoon Kim, Esq.), and each of them, separately and collectively, from any and all existing claims, liens, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever, whether or not now known, suspected, or claimed, that it ever had, now has, or may claim to have had against Defendants relating to any matter whatsoever (including, but not limited to, any included in, relating to, or arising out of the Actions) up to and including the Effective Date.
- Defendants’ Release of Plaintiffs. Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement, Defendants release and forever discharge Plaintiffs and their past and present directors, managers, officers, shareholders, their affiliates, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and their attorneys (including but not limited to: (1) Kim & Bae, P.C., B. J. Kim, Esq., William J. Volonte, Esq., Alan L. Poliner, Esq.; (2) Lesley Davis Law Firm, Lesley B. Davis, Esq.; and (3) Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C., Paul S. Chan, Esq., Ekwan E. Rhow, Esq., David I. Hurwitz, Esq., Fanxi Wang, Esq., and Grace W. Kang, Esq.), and each of them, separately and collectively, from any and all existing claims, liens demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever, whether or not now known, suspected, or claimed, that he ever had, now has, or may claim to have had against Plaintiffs relating to any matter whatsoever (including, but not limited to, any included in, relating to, or arising out of the Actions) up to and including the Effective Date.
- Known and Unknown Claims. The general releases in this Settlement Agreement extend to all claims that the Parties do not know or suspect to exist in their favor, which, if known by the Parties, would have materially affected their decision to enter into this Settlement Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that they are familiar with Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides as follows:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
The Parties expressly waive and relinquish any right or benefit which they have or may have under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code and under any other statute or legal principle with similar effect.
In connection with such waiver and relinquishment, the Parties acknowledge that they are aware that, after executing this Settlement Agreement, the Parties or the Parties’ attorneys or agents may discover Released Claims or facts in addition to, or different from, those which they now know or believe to exist with respect to the subject matter of this Settlement Agreement or the Parties hereto, but that it is the Parties’ intention hereby to fully, finally, and forever settle and release all of the Released Claims, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, which now exist, may exist, or heretofore may have existed among them. In furtherance of this intention, the releases herein given shall be, and remain in effect as, full and complete releases notwithstanding the discovery or existence of any such additional or different claim or fact.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the settlement terms, such releases shall not release any Party from any obligations under this Settlement Agreement. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement is intended or shall be construed as a release of any future claim relating to conduct after the Effective Date.
- Attorneys’ Fees and Costs for the Actions. The Parties will bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the Actions.
- Confidentiality. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement were made in confidence and shall remain confidential. The Parties agree that they shall not knowingly disclose, privately or publicly, or knowingly cause or allow to be disclosed, privately or publicly, any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement to any person or entity, except as required by law or as necessary to comply with the law in the event that legal proceedings are commenced to enforce any obligations of a party to the Agreement. It is expressly agreed that the Agreement is admissible in the event that a proceeding is brought to enforce the terms of the Agreement.
- Notices. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by a reliable overnight courier service or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the other Party at the address below or to such other address for which such Party shall give notice hereunder. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given one (1) day after the date of sending if by overnight courier service, or five (5) days after the date of sending by registered or certified mail.
[ ]
[ ]
- Representations and Warranties. Each Party represents and warrants that it has the sole right and exclusive authority to execute this Settlement Agreement on behalf of such Party. Each Party further represents and warrants that it has read this Settlement Agreement in its entirety and fully understands and agrees to it.
- Choice of Law and Dispute Resolution. This Settlement Agreement shall be governed by, and is to be interpreted according to, the laws of the State of California without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof. In any action to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, including experts fees and costs.
- Settlement Agreement Binding. This Settlement Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective owners, shareholders, affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, agents, successors, and assigns.
- No Admission of Wrongdoing. This Settlement Agreement, whether or not consummated, its execution or delivery, any negotiations relating thereto, and any actions taken pursuant to it, do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, an admission or acknowledgment by either party of any liability whatsoever to the other party or any other person or entity.
- No Construction against Drafter. For purposes of any action arising out of the application, interpretation, or alleged breach of this Settlement Agreement brought by either Party, each Party waives California Civil Code Section 1654, any other statutory or common law principle of similar effect, and any judicial interpretation of this Settlement Agreement that would create a presumption against any other Party as a result of its having drafted any provision of this Settlement Agreement. Counsel for the respective Parties have reviewed and revised this Settlement Agreement, and there shall not be applied any rule construing ambiguities against the drafting Party or Parties.
- Severability. The provisions of this Settlement Agreement are severable, and if any part of it is found to be unenforceable, the other parts shall remain fully valid and enforceable, unless the provision found to be unenforceable is of such material effect that this Settlement Agreement cannot be performed in accordance with the intent of the Parties in absence of any such provision.
- Entire Agreement. This Settlement Agreement contains the entire understanding and complete agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Settlement Agreement, and all understandings and agreements, if any, previously reached among the Parties are merged into this Settlement Agreement. No amendment or modification of this Settlement Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the Parties unless made in writing and executed by all Parties.
- Headings. The headings contained in this Settlement Agreement are for reference only and shall not affect the meaning of any of the provisions of this Settlement Agreement.
- Counterparts. This Settlement Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Execution of a copy shall have the same force and effect as execution of an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Settlement Agreement.
Dated: January __, 2018 Jeungsando of America, Inc.
By: ___________________________________
Name:
Title:
Title:
Dated: January __, 2018 Myung Sun Yoo
___________________________________
Dated: January __, 2018 Jae Nam Kim
___________________________________
Dated: January __, 2018 Jae Sung Chung
___________________________________
Dated: January __, 2018 Karys Dalsook Ma
___________________________________
Dated: January __, 2018 Un Sook Park
___________________________________
REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dated: January __, 2018 Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.
By: ___________________________________
Paul Chan
Attorneys for Jeungsando of America, Inc., Myung Sun Yoo, Jae Nam Kim, and Jae Sung Chung
Dated: January __, 2018 Dahiya Law Offices LLC
By: ___________________________________
Karamvir Dahiya
Attorneys for Karys Dalsook Ma and Un Sook Park
증산도측이 2018년 1월26일 뉴욕연방파산법원에서 법정에서 사기를 쳤는데 그 증거자료중의 일부이다.
카리스 마와는 아무런 합의가 없었음에도 합의서로 판사님에게 제출하여 재판을 하였다.
정호진 김재남 정재성등은 뉴욕소송에 아무런 관련이 없는 상황에서 관련이 아주 많은것처럼 조작을 하였다. 위의 세사람은 어떠한 이유에서던지 합의서에 나오지 않아야 하는데 버젓이 이름이 올라가 있다.
증산도의 사기의 진수를 보여주는 서류중의 하나일것이다.
추천 0 비추천 0
댓글목록
상제님만세님의 댓글
상제님만세 작성일
개벽 사기도 치는데,,재탕,삼탕,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,이로 인해 인생 조진 사람 많아요
지금도 조지고 있구요 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ
저,,,,, 넘들 조져 버려요
용춘님의 댓글
용춘 작성일거짓은 만죄의 근원이라고 하셨는데ㅡ우얄라꼬 그라는동~ㅋ
행인님의 댓글
행인
예전에는 태을주 수행을 하면서 남을 원망하고 저주하는 기도를 드리지 마라 그리하면 화를 입는다고 본인들이 주장했으면서 정작 그런주장을 한 종단에서 저주기도를 햇다는 소문도 있다지요.