Paul S. Chan - State Bar No. 183406

    pchan@birdmarella.com

David I. Hurwitz - State Bar No. 174632

    dhurwitz@birdmarella.com

BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM,
DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.

1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067-2561

Telephone: (310) 201-2100

Facsimile: (310) 201-2110

 

Attorneys for Defendants Jeungsando of America, Inc., Jae Nam Kim and Jae Sung Chung

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT

   

Jeungsando of America, Inc. Myung Sun Yoo, Jae Nam Kim and Jae Sung Chung, , on the one hand, and Karys Dalsook Ma and Un Sook Park, on the other hand, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1.    On November 9, 2015, Jeungsando of America, Inc. and Myung Sun Yoo filed a lawsuit against Ma and Un Sook Park in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. CV 15-6400-CBA-VMS, alleging claims for defamation, copyright infringement, under the Digital Millennial Copyright Act, prima facie tort, civil conspiracy, under the Enforcement Act (Civil Rights Act) of 1871; full faith and credit, res judicata, and collateral estoppel for decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea and the Seoul Central District Court of the Republic of Korea, under the New York State Constitution Bill of Rights and injunctive relief (the “New  York Action”).

2.    On June 30, 2016, Ma filed a lawsuit against Joong Kun Ahn, Jeungsando (a Korean religious organization (“Jeungsando”)), Kim, Chung and Jong Sung Lee, Hyung Sung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Suk Kim, Kiyong Kim, Jyung Sun Yoo, and Does 1-50, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC625692, alleging claims for slander and libel, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, declarative relief, and false accusation (the “California Action”).

3.    Following mediation, the Parties reached a resolution of the New York Action, the California Action, and all claims between them, memorialized in a Settlement Agreement dated and effective [ ], 2018.  The Settlement Agreement includes, among other things, mutual non-disparagement provisions.

4.    The Settlement Agreement provides that if Ma breaches the Settlement Agreement, and further fails to cure the breach within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of a written notice of default (with such written notice to be delivered to both Ma and his counsel), Jeungsando of America is entitled to move for entry of the [Proposed] Judgment appended to this Stipulation.

5.    Ma at all relevant times has been represented by competent counsel and knowingly and voluntarily entered into the Settlement Agreement and this Stipulation after careful consideration of all the facts, law, and potential outcome of the New York Action and the California Action.  Ma understands that the potential outcome of litigation could have resulted in a judgment against him in excess of the value of the settlement.

6.    Pursuant to the liquidated damages provision of the Settlement Agreement, the sum of the judgment to be entered in the event of an uncured breach of the Settlement Agreement will be $36,000, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

8.    No appeal shall be taken by any party from this judgment, the right to appeal being expressly waived by the Parties.

9.    Judgment shall be entered pursuant hereto in the event the Court grants the regularly-noticed motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Jeungsando of America, Inc.

 

                By:    ___________________________________

                    Name:    
                    Title:    

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Myung Sun Yoo

 

                    ___________________________________

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Jae Nam Kim

 

                    ___________________________________

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Jae Sung Chung

 

                    ___________________________________

                    

Dated:    January __, 2018        Karys Dalsook Ma

 

                    ___________________________________

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Un Sook Park

 

                    ___________________________________

 

            

REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:

 

Dated:    January __, 2018        Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,                                 Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.

 

            By: ___________________________________

                Paul Chan

    Attorneys for Jae Nam Kim, and Jae Sung Chung

 

Dated:    January __, 2018    Dahiya Law Offices LLC

 

            By: ___________________________________

                Karamvir Dahiya

                    Attorneys for Karys Dalsook Ma

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT AGAINST KARYS DALSOOK MA

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED that, based on the Settlement Agreement dated [ ], 2018, and based on the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and [Proposed] Judgment dated [ ], 2018, and good cause appearing:

JUDGMENT is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that judgment is entered in favor of Jeungsando of America, Inc. and against Karys Dalsook Ma in the amount of $___________, plus attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $ _______, for a total of $___________.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 

 

 

            This Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Jeungsando of America, Inc. (“Jeungsando of America”), a religious corporation, Myung Sun Yoo (“Yoo”), Jae Nam Kim (“Kim”) and Jae Sung Chung (“Chung”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Karys Dalsook Ma (“Ma”), and Un Sook Park (“Park”) (collectively “Defendants”), on the other hand.  Plaintiffs and Defendants are sometimes referred to collectively as the “Parties” and referred to individually as a “Party.”  

 

WHEREAS, on or about November 9, 2015, Jeungsando of America and Yoo filed a lawsuit against Ma and Park in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. CV 15-6400-CBA-VMS, alleging claims for defamation, copyright infringement, under the Digital Millennial Copyright Act, prima facie tort, civil conspiracy, under the Enforcement Act (Civil Rights Act) of 1871; full faith and credit, res judicata, and collateral estoppel for decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea and the Seoul Central District Court of the Republic of Korea, under the New York State Constitution Bill of Rights and injunctive relief (the “New York Action”);

 

WHEREAS, on or about June 30, 2016, Ma filed a lawsuit against Joong Kun Ahn, Jeungsando (a Korean religious organization (“Jeungsando”)), Kim, Chung and Jong Sung Lee, Hyung Sung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Seok Kim, Kiyong Kim, Myung Sun Yoo, and Does 1-50, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC625692, alleging claims for slander and libel, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, declarative relief, and false accusation (the “California Action”);

 

WHEREAS, on May 24, 2017, the Court in the California Action sustained Ho Jin Chung’s demurrer without leave to amend, and dismissed the entire action as against Ho Jin Chung;

 

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2017, the Court in the California Action granted Kim and Chung’s Special Motion to Strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, and denied Kim and Chung’s request for attorneys’ fees without prejudice;

 

WHEREAS, persons affiliated with Jeungsando have caused civil and criminal actions to be brought against Ma in the Republic of Korea for copyright violations and defamation (the “Korea Actions”);

 

WHEREAS, the Parties hereto wish to forever discharge and release all claims, demands, liabilities, and causes of action between them, including the New York Action, California Action, and Korea Action (collectively the “Actions”);

 

            NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:

 

 

 

 서류 일부만 올립니다.

 

 

 

 

 

위의 서류에서 빨간글자를 보시라. 

증산도측에서 내가 동의하였다고 조작하여 합의서를 지난 1월 26일날 중재재판에 제출하였다. 이와 함께 로스엔젤러스 법원에도 안운산의 성폭행 통화파일을 제출하여 정재성과 김재남 그리고 내가 그문제로 뉴욕법원과 엘에이 법원에서 싸우는것으로 조작을하여 서류를 제출하여 판사를 속여 변호사비용을 받아내는 판결을 받아내는데 성공하였다.

 

나는 이문제와 뉴욕연방법원 중재재판사기건 두건을 가지고 증산도측과 증산도측변호사를 검찰과 소송 변호사협회 법무부등에 민원을 제기하여 만천하에 증산도의 만행을 알리게 될 것이다.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

증산도측에서 사문서 위조를 넘어 사문서조작을 통해 재판 사기를 쳤다. 이문제를 가지고 엘에이 검찰과 스테이트 바 (변호사협회)에 사건을 접수 하여 이 사건에 관하여 즐감하시기 바랍니다. 그리고 이와 동시에 서부연방법원에 소송이 들어가니 증산도측은 해야 할 일들이 많습니다. 변호사 선임 다시해야 하고 유죄가 나오면 변호사들은 옷 벗고 증산도측 간부 신도들은 감옥으로 가던지 미국을 떠나야 할 일들이 생길것으로 생각이 됩니다. 

 

느긋하게 일처리 하고 있으니 여러분들은 악마집단의 대응을 보시기 바랍니다. 없는죄도 만들어 죄인 만들어 악업을 충실히 쌓고 있는 집단입니다. 내가 미국 법무부를 어떻게 움직이는지도 한번 기대해 보시기 바랍니다. 변호사들 조작 사기친것을 대대적으로 물고 늘어 질 것입니다.

 

증산도측은 출교공문의 위력 또한 감상하게 될 것이다.